This temporary Starter account, Explorer, was
automatically created for you.
A Starter account can do almost everything a normal account can do such as Liking and Favoriting photos, but it will expire after a while.
To rename this account and keep it for yourself just enter your email address in the header dropdown above.
It's that easy.
Login or sign up to comment.
I also cannot help but join the side discussion: I joined 500px very recently due to the professional presentation of the galleries, yet I was rather disappointed by the (mostly) low quality comments on such (mostly) high quality work. I came here to learn, to be inspired, and to improve. How can I improve if a commenter does not inform me what attracted or disgusted him/her in my photo?
Words have incredible power, gentlemen. Let's use them wisely.
I agree that comment should be much more meaningful on 500px, not just 'great compo' or 'nice', especially if you didn't like the image.
Oh, and btw, thanks for having had a look at my pic "... and at shortly after 6..." and your comment, which, although pretty non-specific, is for me definitely more welcome as any of the many meaningless comments here on 500px which just demonstrate an interest in getting a mutual like to boast one's ego (a game I'm not taking part in, likes and dislikes being just funny collateral things for which I couldn't care less; me being interested in learning and helping others to learn as good as I as a beginner can). You probably won't care and will tell me that you didn't ask for advice but the form with which you criticize (also checked your flow) reveals a great deal of arrogance and rudeness on your side and unfounded self-assuredness; your subjective opinion is just that, nothing more, not the truth.
It's true that I post maybe a little too much negative comments, but I don't find it a really bad thing.
Recently 500px moved a lot more towards people who like other photos not because they are professional and pleasing, but to promote their own imagery. It results in lot's of extremely low-quality pictures showing up in popular. And it seems really strange to me that noone, noone at all, even willing to point that out. Positive comments just keep showing, even though the picture is well below amateure level - just a badly processed snapshot.
I would prefer that when I post a bad image someone from the experts of 500px comunity will add a critique comment - such things help a lot to move forward and understand better in photography, even though it may offend and sadden one a little.
So, thank you for your comment. I still think that that particular image of yours is a really bad HDR execution, even though your other images look much better. Sorry if that offends you.
l.g.Leo