What they are and when you need them.
In the photography industry, a model release is a binding legal agreement between a photographer and their model or any potentially recognizable human subjects. This agreement ensures that everyone is aware, feels compensated, and has consented to commercial usage of their likeness. There are multiple versions and formats of model releases, but all of them must share four main statements to cover commercial licensing:
To be acceptable and legally relevant, the release must contain information about the photographer and the model, including mailing address and contact information (such as email and/or phone number, and home address) and must be signed by both parties. Additionally, not only the photographer, but “their assigns,” or similar, must be mentioned in order for the photographer to license their content through agencies, vendors, and distributors.
If there is a recognizable person in your photo and you want to make it available for Creative (Commercial) licensing, you ALWAYS need a model release. Without one you could be liable and face serious legal issues brought by your models for improper use of their likeness. For a model, commercial licensing means that their depiction will be used to sell and promote something (often, not knowing for what or how). To protect the model, additional considerations in our partner’s end user license agreements and the 500px standard model release, limit the usage and restrict how the image can be used (i.e. never in a defamatory way, in pornography, or other offensive materials).
The general questions you have to ask yourself in order to determine whether you need a model release are:
You may think that a “recognizable person” means a full frontal, straight on, and clearly visible person. However, that is not always the case. Sometimes a person can be recognizable by other factors like context, location, the people they are with, clothing, or tattoos. Besides profiting on likeness, in some jurisdictions liability could also include violating someone’s perceived privacy for commercial gain. Let’s clarify some of those cases.
If the person in the image is the main focus or if his/her distinctive features can be identified from the silhouette, you need a model release. If the person is small and there is no context or details that can make it recognizable, you don’t need one.
Model release needed. The model’s features are very visible and recognizable.
No model release needed. There is no detail or factor that can make these people recognizable and their features are not visible.
Normally you don’t need a model release for detailed shots of body parts, like hands or feet. Though in some cases, a person may be able to identify themselves due to tattoos or birthmarks, in which case a model release is required.
No model releases needed. Low-risk since the focus is on the sparklers and not on the people.
Model release needed. The tattoo makes this person highly recognizable even if her face is not visible.
Even if the model’s face is not clearly visible there may be contextual factors that could make him/her identifiable. Factors like unique outfits or clothes, locations, and photo shoot setting.
Model release needed. The location and the outfit of the model makes her very recognizable even if her face is not visible.
No model releases needed. There are no recognizable or unique details visible. Even if the main focus of the image is the person there is not enough context to make them recognizable.
There are some cases where you want to make sure you have a model release no matter what. Subjects like minors or nudes are considered sensitive matter and they always require more caution. If the model of your photo shoot is a minor, you need a model release signed by a parent or guardian.
Just as people are recognizable so are private locations and property. Like a model release, a property release is a binding legal agreement between a photographer and the owner or authorized representative of a potentially recognizable private property. For photos taken on private property, or on public property where a distinctive private property is featured, obtaining a signed release will ensure all parties approve of the property being featured in photos intended for commercial purposes. Here are some examples:
For the latter three, we recommend you look online for their photography rules before you visit e.g. Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park in Australia (Ayers Rock) has their photography restrictions posted on their official website here. Photography guidelines are often posted in the ‘Media’ or ‘Filming’ section of a website.
Property releases may also required if a product or work of art is featured in the photo, even public art is protected by copyright law. Here are some other examples to keep in mind:
The general questions you have to ask yourself in order to determine whether you need a property release are:
As a contributor, it is your responsibility to know when a release is required. To avoid having your photos declined for licensing we strongly recommend you research your potential locations online ahead of time to find out if there are any photography restrictions in place. If you’re unsure, you can always check with us ahead of time. Many properties and locations post their photography guidelines on their official website, on signs throughout the property, or on admission tickets e.g. concert tickets will often say “no photography allowed”. It doesn’t hurt to check ahead of time so that you’re prepared in case there are restrictions.
For more information about specific property and legal restrictions please check out our distribution partner’s resource, the Getty Images Wiki page, a common resource of knowledge about Intellectual Property (including trademark, copyright, etc.), privacy and private property rights that you need to be aware of any time you are creating or submitting content. You can also review this article on Creative (Commercial) and Editorial photography for further details.
At first it does, and when you’re not used to working with releases it may seem restrictive. However, besides being one of the largest legal risks of working as a commercial photographer, having the piece of mind that your models and location owners are all consenting is well worth the effort.
After having your first few releases signed, you’ll notice how easy it is, how quickly it can be done, and when and how best to approach your models and subjects. Speak with any professional commercial photographer and they’ll tell you it’s a necessary and painless process once you’ve become proficient at it.
You can download a model release or property release below:
Thanks to technological advances, you can even use a mobile app to legally collect and store your model releases. Also, if you need releases in another language we recommend our distribution partner resource - Getty Images Releases in 23 different languages, or the Easy Release app.
Note: This article should serve as a general guideline. Some jurisdictions have special laws regarding privacy, language issues on legal contracts, or other special considerations. Please ensure that your model releases comply with your local laws.